Collaboration is key

Social networking in its varied forms opens doors for writers to work together — and not just with other writers. If you've watched Inside the Actors Studio, you may recall the part of the show where James Lipton asks the actor, "If you weren't an actor, what profession would you most like to take up?" A similar concept applies in collaborative writing.

Even with a social component, writing can still be solitary work. Here are reasons to broaden your horizon:

• Credits: You can add writing credits to your roster.
• Experience: You can broaden — and deepen — the experience you already have, and gain new experiences, too.
• Networking: You can expand and enhance your professional contacts, especially if you work with someone well-recognized in the field.
• Skills: You can hone yours by working with someone who has expertise you don't yet possess.
• Perspective: There's nothing like a fresh perspective from a different set of eyes and mind — like opening a window in a closed room.
• Friendships: Not only can you expand your contact base, but you can also make friends, not just with other writers, but with other creative types — actors, playwrights, directors, poets, musicians.

Of course, there are pitfalls to collaboration:

• Discord: Disagreement is inevitable; the key is how each of you handles it. It's helpful to work with someone who won't step over you to get ahead. To work through differing viewpoints, you can set parameters for a point-counterpoint perspective, then switch positions.
• Uneven workload: It's important to find someone with a similar or complimentary work ethic.
• Unscrupulous behavior: It never hurts to treat a collaborative effort as a business venture, even if there's no money involved, but especially if there is. If you're unfamiliar with the person you're planning to work with, get some references upfront to make sure you're working with a reputable colleague.

Tip: In addition to the usual methods of communication — email, IM, file transfers — you may want to use mediums like Skype and Free Conference. They're free and allow you to work more closely with your colleague without compromising the project on a very public site like Facebook.

Over to You: What project have you always wanted to work on with someone else?

Backstory: When and How to Use It Effectively

Click for more on backstory

While revising my novel to get rid of the unnecessary, I came up against that bane and blessing of the writer's existence—backstory. The problem in this instance wasn't so much literal backstory, meaning past events, but backstory in the sense of material that qualified more as supporting the story, rather than the story itself.

So, what is backstory? Merriam's describes it as "a story that tells what led up to the main story or plot." Simply put, it's any aspect of the work that's not part of what's happening now. Even with a working definition, it can be hard to tell where backstory leaves off and story begins.

What was sneaky about my material was that it wasn't quite throat-clearing. The prose was clear, the story flowed, characters were developed, but there was no traction until chapter five, when something brings two main characters together after years apart. In this case, five chapters were way too much to read before reaching an inciting incident. That incident may not need to happen on page one, but the elements should be in place so that by chapter two, the reader is off and running.

To understand how to use backstory effectively, consider three caveats:
Don't put it at the beginning.
Don't use the wrong medium for the message.
Don't overdo it.

For more on how to treat backstory, visit my online workshop: The Art of Editing in Writing for October.

      

What Writers Are Missing: The Playwriting Process

Writers are definitely missing something. No, this isn't an editor ranting about the deficiencies of writers. This is a writer admitting to more than a little envy for what playwrights have that writers don't — dialogue with their characters.

Some of you will instantly respond, "But I do talk to my characters, and they talk to me." I used to think such talk was crazy doodle until those conversations started for me, too. But what I mean here is different. I recently met with playwright Joanne Hudson to go over a piece of flash fiction I wrote called "Days of Obligation" that she's adapting into a play. As part of the process, she asked questions about what I hadn't included in the piece, which is mostly dialogue — what writers call backstory and what actors call motivation. She also said I'd meet with the actors because they'd have questions, too. Playwrights, she said, use this process to hone their work, sometimes even after a play has begun its run. I paused midsentence. "Wow," I said, "We writers are missing a whole side of the creative process."

What Joanne described seems different to me than my sitting down to create characters that originate within my head and are typically developed and nurtured there. The playwright sits down with actual people, a far more interactive and challenging process than one constrained the limits of the individual.

So I got to thinking, wouldn't it be fun to take a scene you're working on and get a couple of people, maybe people who aren't writers, to act it out and to let them, in preparation for acting the scene, sit down with you and ask questions. I'd love to hear how it turns out. I've got a rehearsal with my actors in a couple of days. I'll let you know how things turn out here.