Whether
you write fact-based stories or whole-cloth fiction, crafting a collection
gives you freedom to combine elements of your favorite writing forms to transport you and your readers to places both familiar
and faraway. What’s your favorite writing form — memoir, poetry, short stories,
experimental? Maybe you like mysteries or family sagas. Or maybe for you, it’s
less about genre or form and more about the individual story. If any of these
is true, then compiling a collection might be just the ticket. One great way to
determine whether you have the makings for a compilation is to inventory your
work. If you tend toward writing fiction, you may have a file of short stories
that, with a bit of weaving, could work as a collection. Or maybe you started what
you thought was a novel but now feels more like a series of different but
interconnected stories than a continuous saga. Taking inventory works for
nonfiction, too. Start by perusing blog posts and postcards, journal entries, letters,
a book you may have started writing —any written communication — for a common
thread. Maybe you’ve traveled to distant lands, raised exotic pets, perfected a
particular hobby or started a memoir about a turning point in your life. Any of
these topics can serve as a framework for a montage of pieces with a larger
point, such as people you discovered in your travels or lessons you learned
along the way. So how do you develop a story collection? Think of it as
creating a scrapbook, album or webpage. You can start by selecting pieces on
similar or compatible subjects or themes. After that, you can arrange them in a
particular order, for example, by most recent or farthest back, or by ascending
or descending degree of importance. You might even try a patchwork approach,
where the pieces are less about order and more about proximity: which pieces
work best next to each other. While these are good ways to begin a collection, you’ll
need to strengthen the sense of connection among the pieces for them to truly
work both as standalones and as integral parts of a whole. For this, two
things are required. First, develop each piece to its greatest degree. Second, meld
the pieces together for a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. Sounds
good, right? So how do we create links, and where do the various styles of
writing come in? One way to create links is by repetition, for example, through
characters, people, or settings that show up in more than one story. You might
even have recurring motifs and interconnecting storylines or plotlines. Once
you discover where the connections naturally occur, you can further develop
them by using elements of your favorite writing forms. For example, if you’re
writing a series of family stories, perhaps based on the holidays, you might
include short recollections and images of what people wore, served for meals, or
talked about in the kitchen. Don’t feel compelled to create a clear connection
between the events and the images they may evoke. Instead, you might focus on
theme, for example, that one particular family member or constant guest who
somehow always managed to be the centerpiece of every gathering. To further connect your stories, consider
how stories are told in the oral tradition. Such tales aren’t always told
linearly or chronological order. Instead, one memory sparks another and
another. Don’t worry if there’s a bit of mystery in how the stories
unfold. The understanding of linked stories often comes through sensory details
and the emotions they stir up. To decide which writing form — poetry, flash
fiction, new article or other — would best enhance a piece, consider what would
best showcase the scenes in the piece without overshadowing them. Last, most
collections usually feature a signature story that acts as a polestar for the
compilation and is often the one that sparked the rest. It rarely appears at
the beginning of the collection, though it might appear at the end, as a form
of tie-in for all that has come before. More often, however, the pivotal piece
occurs somewhere in the second third of the compilation, where it functions as
the beating heart of the work as a whole. Whether you enjoy creating fictional
pieces or stories based on fact, crafting a story collection offers an
opportunity to use your favorite writing styles and experiment with those you’d
like to learn better. Happy
writing!
Let’s face it. We’re busy people, with lives, loves, problems,
any or all of which can keep us from writing. So how does one get back into
what iconic Southern gothic writer Flannery O’Connor called the habit of
writing? And might what we learned in the meantime even inspire us? Whether you
step away from writing for moments or decades, it can be tough to get your head
back in the game. And the mind is where the proverbial rubber typically meets
the road. In reality, it’s easier to leave off writing than stick with it.
People do have lives, after all, families, pets, doctor appointments. We all get
hungry, tired, bored, distracted. We have jobs, needs. And sometimes what we
need is a break. Even when we don’t need one, we want one. That said, I don’t necessarily
believe in writer’s block, as people usually mean it: “I sat down to write and
couldn’t.” If you sit down and grouse about why you can’t write, you’re cured.
But you may not be cured of what many really mean by writer’s block: “I can’t
write what I want, how I want.” Another view of writer’s block is the mental
jam-up that occurs when your mind churns out reason after reason not to sit
down and just do it, or to stop doing it because it’s too hard. You don’t have
time. Your writing is bad. You haven’t had an original idea in recent history.
Your work will never go anywhere; neither will you as a writer. Even if you do
write, by the time you’re good at it, everyone will have beaten you to the
publisher, possibly with your very own idea. With internal diatribe like this, who
could turn out another word, let alone one anyone would read? While we agree
that the return to writing isn’t easy, it is straightforward: Write anyway. No
time? Write anyway, even a few notes to start. Bad writing? Write anyway. The
more you write, the better you’ll become. No originality? Write anyway and
revise what you write. Tired, no prospects for your work? Write anyway. You’re
likely to fall back in love with it and continue. For this, the French have a
saying: “Eating builds appetite.” So, too, with writing, and once you finish a
piece, you can seek a home for it. From blogs to podcasts, there are more venues
now than ever, and they need content, thus writers. Even as I say this, sometimes
I’m still stuck for a way to start writing. At such times, I use two basic
techniques. If I’ve already written something, I edit it. If I’m trying to
write something new, I write down my ideas and plans. Then I revise what I’ve
written until it’s as clear as I can get it at that time. With the first method,
the result is a more polished piece. With the second, I have an outline, which
I can divide into sections and revise until they sound more and more like the
actual piece I want to write. As an example, I had an idea for a novel that I
thought might work as a political thriller. I love this genre in film because
it’s engrossing, and I usually learn something. But writing a thriller requires
an airtight plot. So I called on a former mentor, a plot guru, who first had me
write a three-act story treatment. From that, I wrote a 12,000-word chapter
outline. If you’ve heard the adage that even a journey of a thousand miles
starts with a single step, that’s especially true in writing. My thriller plot
outline is now becoming a novel. It’s no longer a political thriller—the genre
is too tightly circumscribed to work with my original story idea—but had I not
gone through the plotting exercises, there’s no way I could have written the
current outline, for a work of historical fiction with magical realism elements. But what about all that time away, did I learn nothing I can use now? Sometimes
stepping away from writing can yield a project of its own. If you’ve seen a
film, read a book, been to a concert or visited an interesting place, you might
write of the experience. You might even find a venue to publish what you’ve
written. If your time off from writing didn’t yield an experience you want to
share, the break can still be beneficial by sheer dint of having been rest. If
getting back into the grove after all this still seems too much, remember the
old Nike slogan: Just do it.
Writer, poet and teacher Jessica Noyes McEntee explores “compression”
and other writing techniques in her new poetry chapbook, Jackie O. Suffers Two Husbands and Other Poems,
from Finishing Line Press. Here she answers questions about the project. What prompted you to put together the chapbook?
I put the chapbook together
for the 2018 New Women's Voices contest held by Finishing Line Press. I didn't
place, but they said they wanted to publish me. I found this really amusing and
surprising (I wasn't good enough for the contest yet I was good enough to be
published!), and then I figured I shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. The
poems represent a smattering of my work from a particular period, as opposed to
a collection centered on a theme. How does your approach to poetry differ from
your approach to fiction? I felt my prose was becoming too verbose and that I
was straying from specificity. Then I read that one of my favorite authors,
Jenny Offill, had studied poetry for ten years while writing Dept. of
Speculation. I started out writing the poems to learn compression, the
poetic device of saying exactly what you mean with high-energy words that pull
their weight and other editorial techniques — I was like a parasite trying to
suck my host dry so I could move back onto my larger prey of fiction. Soon, I
found I quite liked poetry itself. In contrast to writing a novel, a
multi-month if not multiyear endeavor, I could generate a poem and hone it
within a few weeks. I fell into a pattern of writing poetry during the fallow
periods in between writing novels. I don't typically write both at the same time. What main challenge did you encounter in
creating and/or completing the poetry and chapbook, and how did you overcome
it? As someone who's really quite new to the genre — I had studied a bit of
poetry in college and beyond, mostly Elizabeth Bishop and Gwendolyn Brooks – I'm
still refining my ear. I don't totally trust my instincts yet so I remind
myself to embrace this sense of uncertainty. I'm not really tied to the idea of
myself as a poet, but I think this frees me to experiment. I'm grateful for my
poetry teacher, Charles Rafferty, who leads a fantastic class out of Westport
Writers' Workshop, and for my classmates, who are all wonderfully encouraging
of each other. The workshop is hardly a staid atmosphere; we laugh a lot and
goof around with language. What primary writing lesson did you learn while
creating the project? In my experience, a lot of playfulness goes into writing the initial
drafts of a poem so I try not to get too tied to an idea of what the poem “has”
to be. As my writing process evolves, I have to become more and more definite
about what I'm trying to say, giving great attention to
my selection of each individual word. Unlike prose, a poem demands a lean
precision. I have to root out anything that doesn't pull its weight. I suppose
all of this happens with generating prose, too, although with poetry you're
working on a more granular level. What
would you like to add that you feel is important for other writers to know? Because
the genre of poetry is so distilled, I think great poets demonstrate the power
of consistent voice and style. A short list of contemporary poets I'd recommend
for total newbies are Ada Limon, Jenny Xie, Meghan O'Rourke, Billy Collins, Stephen Dunn.
For the chapbook by Jessica McEntee visit, Jackie O. Suffers Two Husbands and Other Poems. A graduate of from Amherst College, Jessica Noyes McEntee worked as an
editor at John Wiley & Sons and taught at St. Ann’s School in Brooklyn
Heights, NY. She currently teaches fiction at the Westport
Writers’ Workshop in Connecticut, and her work has appeared in
Ragazine. Her poetry chapbook, Jackie O. Suffers Two Husbands and Other Poems
will be published in June 2019 by Finishing Line Press, and she won an
honorable mention in the 2019 Third Wednesday poetry contest judged by Robert
Fanning. For more on McEntee, visit her at Jessica McEntee. For more on the workshops, go to Westport Writers’ Workshop.
Gail Ingis writes historical romance with a
twist of mystery set in the Gilded Age. Her latest book, The Unforgettable Miss Baldwin:The Gilded Age Heiresses (Sept.
2019) is available for preorder on Amazon
and through other retailers. Here, Gail talks about writing this latest novel. What
was your biggest challenge in writing the novel, and how did you overcome it? What
comes first, the outline, the theme? What will my focus be? Who are my
characters? Where to begin the book—in a situation, at home, in the office,
with friends, and what era? So many questions. Every author asks herself these
and more when starting a book. My challenge wasn’t fear, it wasn’t lack of
desire, and it wasn’t lack of time. The most difficult part of writing is
plotting the story. For Miss Baldwin’s story, I created a timeline as I wrote, rather
than an outline, before I wrote. The outline is the skeleton—the bones of the
book. However, as you write, the characters often change the direction of the
story, and the original plan gets lost. Then we’re left with a few cracks in
the bones of the plot! After writing two books, and once I have an idea of the
plot or the theme, I decided it would be productive to work from an outline—it
helps create the scenes. I built the scenes with the main thrust, which
in this case was women’s suffrage, fuelled by the common thread of intrigue and
romance to
carry both the love story and the mystery. Some backstory: I had the
opportunity to teach the history of architecture and interior design for many
years—I have always been fascinated by the Victorian era, the overabundance and
exaggeration in design. The style of the period is known for its eclecticism
and oddities in dress, homes, and architecture. There was an undercurrent of
higher moral standards—this era was not quite like the Age of Enlightenment,
but it was a period of change. As women, we continue to fight for equality so [I
thought] why not write about the women’s struggle of the 19th century that led
up to the nineteenth amendment giving women the vote? That’s how I found my
theme—women’s suffrage. I’m Brooklyn born and bred, so it was easy to choose
New York City as my setting, in particular, where my heroine and her family
lived across the street from Central Park. What was the most enjoyable part
of the writing process? The most enjoyable part of the process was creating
scenes, entwining them, and watching how the characters came alive and helped build
the story. Are/were you part of any writing communities that supported your
goal of completing the novel? If so, how were they helpful? I can’t say
enough about the importance of getting involved with a local writing group—taking
mini-courses and talking to other writers. I highly valued your workshop,
Adele. The writer’s group varied in experience, but I still valued the input,
with your leadership. What would you like to add about writing—or writing a
novel—that you feel is important for writers to know? Learn the craft. Every
word and every sentence has meaning and importance. Understand the hook, show
don’t tell, always keep the point of view in mind, write active scenes, and
remember there is a rhythm to writing—cadence, as well as a rhythm to the
chapters. Read your work aloud—the words, the beat, and the rhythm will be apparent,
more evident than when you read quietly to yourself. And remember to have fun! More About Gail Ingis Gail Ingis writes historical romance with a twist of mystery set in the
Gilded Age. Her latest book, The
Unforgettable Miss Baldwin: The Gilded Age Heiresses (Sept. 2019) is available for preorder
on Amazon
and through other retailers. Her first novel, Indigo Sky, is also available on Amazon
and through other retailers(2015 Soul Mate Publishing). The
love story behind Albert Bierstadt’s Domes
of Yosemite was Gail’s inspiration to write Indigo Sky. The painting, now in St. Johnsbury Atheneum in Vermont
once hung in Lockwood-Mathews Mansion Museum, Norwalk, Connecticut, where she
serves as a trustee and curator of art. Before her debut as an author, Gail
illustrated the book Seeking Paradise by Deborah Galiley (2009,
OakTara Publishers).Gail’s career in interior design and
architecture culminated in her founding a school of interior design, Interior Design Institute, now part of
Berkeley College. Her professorship extended to colleges across NJ, CT, and NY. Gail has memberships in several interior design and
art organizations, and membership in the Romance Writers of America. She
resides in Connecticut with her scientist-writer husband, Tom, who is
supportive of her work and her writing.
In
the era of cell phones, tablets and microcomputers, writing longhand may not
come naturally or easily, but there are benefits to mind, body and story. One
benefit of writing by hand is a closer mind-body connection. Using a favorite
pen and journal to record ideas, to expand later or just for yourself in the
moment, slows the thought process and gives the mind an outlet for those
thoughts through tactile sensation. The benefits of list writing, for example,
include more than just creating reminders; they also include a sense of
release, from the moment the first item appears on the page. Writing longhand
also helps minimize and even eliminate distractions. Not only are you not
online (at least not directly), you’re also focusing more directly on the page
and the written word. This degree of concentration slows the writing process to
enable your imagination to more fully envision and record images, which can
lead to better-developed concepts, scenes, characters and stories. When writers
concentrate more fully on their work, they also become better writers, because
they’re more aware in real time of their word choices and the effects of those
choices. This is called “listening to the work” and trains the writer’s ear to
hear the differences between, for example, active and passive voice, and to
notice the betterments of using fewer and more precise words to tighten and
strengthen stories, whether fictional or real life. When writers take time to
“hear” to their work, they also focus less on fixing it, which yields greater
freedom to explore a theme or topic in organic way. When we’re not continually
in editing mode, we give ourselves a chance to discover what works in our
writing, what doesn’t and why. As a result, we gain mastery over our work and
confidence. This helps us learn faster. So if you like to learn by doing and by
trial and error, as I often do, longhand is a great way to gain, use and
increase your knowledge. Of course, there are also clear benefits to using a
device for writing. First, the process produces text faster and easier than
writing longhand. Most programs even correct you as you write, and you can use
the program’s spellcheck, grammar check and thesaurus without stepping away
from your work. Once you create a piece, it’s a lot easier to save and upload
it to work on later, virtually anywhere (pun intended). Of course, you can
carry a pen and paper nearly anywhere, too, but it’s hard to beat the
convenience of a device to create, edit, save and rework a writing project.
These advantages make devices more than convenient for creating first drafts
and meeting deadlines. In reality, you don’t have to make a once-for-all choice
of longhand or device for your writing. Each style or project tends to create
its own parameters, such as time constraints, energy level, type or style of
writing, personal preference and mood. When I was growing up, for example, I
preferred writing longhand for journal entries and poetry. I still do. There’s
something inherently pleasing about opening a journal, especially a new one,
taking out a favorite pen and sitting down to write on a pristine page, like
first footsteps in snow. For me, it’s a way to uncover and explore my thoughts
and emotions, especially when something is happening in my life that I want to
examine. Those instances deserve the human touch, through sufficient time and
close attention.
Whether we write
fact, fiction or both, pain informs and can enhance our work. To make the most
of what we’ve endured, however, we must be mindful of what and how we write. Many
artists create their best pieces from the pyre of suffering. Beethoven went
deaf at 45; Georgia O'Keeffe struggled with depression. Author David Foster
Wallace struggled with depression and addiction. Artists work through their
pain, around it, with it, from it. To make the most of what we’ve endured, we might
consider the advice of author Dorothy Sayers in her essay “Why Work?”, and
allow our experience to “serve the work”. Born in Oxford, England, Sayers is
best known for her Lord Peter Wimsey mysteries, but in all endeavors Sayers believed
that while many feel that work, in whatever form, ought to serve the community,
there is a “catch” in this line of thinking. Her reasoning as a person of faith
was that there is a “paradox about working to serve the community”, and there are
three reasons why this is true. First, a person can’t “do good work if you take
your mind off the work to see how the community is taking it.” Second, “the
moment you think of serving other people, you begin to have a notion that other
people owe you something for your pains; you begin to think that you have a
claim on the community.” Third, if you aim to serve the community, “you will
probably end by merely fulfilling a public demand—and you may not even do that.” In her book The Forest for the Trees: An
Editor's Advice to Writers, Betsy Lerner made a similar observation about
checking the community pulse on what to write. “People who try to figure out
what’s hot and re-create it are as close to delusional as you can get. Once a
trend is actually identified it is usually too late; your work will be regarded
as opportunistic, as jumping on the bandwagon…” While some writers may be altruistic
enough not to consider the potential return on their investment before they
start writing, once a thing is written and received, or not—for the community
is not awaiting with baited breath the words of the writer’s imagination—that is
the moment when the writer realizes just how much of what he or she has written
was not for the work—meaning the integrity of the project—but for the sake of a
response. Even where there is a legitimate public demand for treatment of a
particular topic, where is the artistry in putting the cart before the horse? So
what about us? Should we write of our painful experiences? If so, how?
Moreover, why? If we do decide to explore a difficult experience, should there be
parameters or guidelines to enable our writing to benefit us and others without
bringing harm? I know a writer with a chronic health condition who eventually
decided to record the experience via an essay on a national website. What made this
person write of the condition and share it that way? First, in researching the
topic, the writer learned of alternative medicine options whose treatments were
helpful. This made the writer think, if these helped me, they could help
others. Since the information wasn’t yet mainstream, efforts to surface it did
help others. Just as important, maybe more so, by that time the writer was
talking about the topic with friends and family. In other words, the time was
right, not just for the topic but for the writer. I also know a writer who
wrote about sexual assault and found that writing about the incident helped her
and others. So what made her take this big step? First, she was inspired by the
bravery of one of her students to write of a similar instance. Second, she
tested the story on friends before sharing it widely. Surprised at how many
people echoed her experience and encouraged her, she gained confidence that sharing
it widely could help still more people: those who have endured sexual assault
and close to them. In this example, the steps she took were both incremental
and affirming. These two examples, both about writing nonfiction, share several
commonalities:
The writer wrote not only for personal gain but also for others.
The writer selected a trustworthy medium related to the topic.
The writer wrote
the story when the time was right, and first put the writing aside to consider
what to do with it before sharing it.
The writer had a trusted friend, someone
with firsthand experience, read the work before the piece was sent and shared.
The
writer tested the experience on a smaller local audience before going global.
Once on the web, it’s forever, or at least it feels that way.
If you don’t want
to write about a painful experience directly as nonfiction, you might consider
fictionalizing it. One way to do this is to consider the emotional truth of what
happened. In other words, what was the lesson learned, and how might it become
the theme of a poem, flash fiction, a short story or a novel? If you write fiction
and have been through a difficult experience, and the further one goes along in
life, the more one goes through, you might allow your experience to inform, not
dictate, the work or its direction. The points above regarding nonfiction
writing also apply to fiction. There’s no rule that says a writer has to write
about a painful experience and share it with others. We can write about what
happened and decide not to share it. Either
way, what we write, how we write it and who we are because of what we’ve been
through can be enhanced by what we’ve experienced.
The sincerest form of flattery is imitation, and
it’s a great way to learn how to write better, too, long as you bring originality
to the process.
Once upon a time, there was an annual writing contest called
the International Imitation Hemingway Competition, also known as the Bad
Hemingway Contest, where writers could submit a “really good page of really bad
Hemingway” in the clipped, minimalist style of the Nobel laureate. There were
only two rules for the competition: Entrants had to mention Harry's Bar &
Grill, one of Hemingway's favorite haunts, and their stories had to be funny. Whether
for competition or practice, the savvy writer might go a step further and try out
Hemingway’s iceberg theory, which he learned in journalism and retained in
writing fiction, where a story’s meaning has greater impact when buried under
the surface of the work, with just enough significance visible above the waterline
to point to more beneath. Practicing this approach helps writers sharpen and
condense their prose toward a subtler and stronger overall impression on the
reader. The next step then is for writers to discover and use their unique voice in conveying the stories and topics that excite them most. Several years ago, I attended a Connecticut
Authors & Publisher’s Association Writers Conference and had lunch with
four longtime literary agents who represented both fiction and nonfiction. As they
began talking among themselves, I became a fly on the wall, listening as they
described the challenges of sifting through hundreds of queries a day. Yet, what
the agents lamented most was less the work of responding to email and more the
dearth of fresh ideas—for novels and nonfiction. No one bemoaned writers using classic
themes for their stories or popular nonfiction topics for their books but that comparatively
few writers took the time to develop these ideas using fresh perspectives. One
classic novella employed innovatively for film was Joseph Conrad's 1899 Heart of Darkness as inspiration for the
1979 epic film Apocalypse Now, on the
Vietnam War. Even with a different setting and era than the original work, Apocalypse presented both a familiar
archetype and an original story, on the complexities and human cost of war. While
there’s nothing new under the sun, you can bring your original take to an old
favorite. As an exercise in originality and intentionality, you might choose a
favorite story, song or film and craft a paragraph describing how you would
“remake” the work in your style, from your viewpoint. You can use the ideas of
others by imitation; just make sure to give them your unique spin. Happy
writing!
Many writers, aspiring and established, believe the ideal job is to
write—all day, every day. But there are advantages to not having writing as a
day job.
It sounds counterintuitive, but having a job as a writer isn’t always
what it’s cracked up to be. Nobel Prize-winner Ernest Hemingway said journalism
was a great way to learn the craft of writing, long as you got out in time.
What did he mean? If you work as a writer, especially in a demanding career
like reporting, you could burn out sooner than later. Having a job other than
writing also lets you use a different mental skill set, meet new people, get a
change of scenery and pace, and receive an income. And having the stability
that comes from a regular paycheck and benefits can give you a sense of a
security that helps make writing less stressful. Another positive is that your
work may enable you to develop a specialty that even if it doesn’t relate directly
to your writing now could do so later, in surprising ways. Acclaimed
poet-author Cortney Davis was a nurse before becoming a poet, and her work in
healthcare not only informed her poetry but gave her a unique perspective and
topic to write about. Whether or not your work includes writing or leads to it,
you’re gaining transferable soft skills, for example, sticking to a project
from start to finish or tackling thankless and challenging tasks. You might
also learn to solve problems by creating outside-the-box solutions that
stimulate your creativity. Then there’s the skill of showing up, which isn’t
glamorous but is far more valuable than people realize. But what do you do if
you work at a dead-end job that doesn’t offer many advantages? Or what if you
have a job that has advantages but does little to inspire you? In cases like
these, a little initiative goes a long way. First, make time — to read, write
and collaborate. One way to read well and widely is to join a book club, online
or in-person. Also, stay in touch with those who enjoy reading and writing. And
do write. You might start by journaling about your day and jotting down story
ideas. Keep a running list, and set aside time to develop your ideas. And look
for ways to collaborate with other writers. You might meet at a local café,
bookstore or library for dedicated writing time. You might also join—or start—a
writing group, in person or online. Regardless of your day or night, with a bit
of effort you can stay inspired. Even if your job doesn’t relate to writing now
and won’t ever, having work that keeps you from flexing your writing muscles or
expressing your ideas can stimulate your longing to write. The very absence of
writing opportunities can draw your heart in that direction. To help you on your journey, these websites offer free databases of
writing opportunities: Association of
Writers & Writing Programs,NewPages,Poets & Writers,The Writer,The
Writer’s Chronicle and Writer’s Digest. You might even
try a writer’s residency by researching ResArtis.